Social and political criticisms
I watched the hearing where the whistle blower told "all" about the PDAF JLN scandal. I doubt whether his testimony would be enough to convict Janet Napoles or solons for good.
The testimony could be nothing more than hearsay, or a fish tale.
The admission that they faked the signature of the senators and that they got their share in cash would not be enough to convict the recipients. Only the whistle blower, and if faked the signature of the senator could be held liable. If there was no written order from JLN
Who cares who Mr. Sexy Senator is? If you can not tie him down with the receipt of the money, what are we talking about here?
