Pages

Showing posts with label Ben Hur Luy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ben Hur Luy. Show all posts

Friday, November 8, 2013

The presentation of facts at the Napoles Hearing in Senate have loose ends and must have given the defense time to prepare

Social and political criticisms

                             
                                Napoles at the Senate hearing wearing bulletproof vest

Repost from Rappler

The hearing at the Senate proceeded despite the request of JLN to postpone her appearance at the Senate because her defense counsel Atty Lorna Kapunan resigned  (Is it because one of the alleged recipient of the PDAF commission was surnamed Kapunan too)

Many of the "facts" mentioned by Ben Hur Luy and other whistle blowers yesterday, November 8, 2013,  were loose and could not specifically pin down link the solons he/they mentioned to the receipt of the money/commission.   The mentioning of the names without solid evidence (all they have are testimonials) like documents available :  cash or check vouchers, memos, agreements, written orders.  It could even  be held defamatory.

Only Jane Napoles, holds the key to linking the alleged recipients, the solons to the crime.  Without her confirmation, nothing will prosper.  Without her turning witness, her joining forces with the whistle blowers, we could only dismiss this as another "palabas"  distraction.  As of now, only the NGO and Napoles will hold the brunt of the case.  The alleged commissioners will go scot free.  But then again, we need the truckload of evidence. To prove who indeed was lying.  Where are they?

Perhaps Sen Santiago is aware of the exact nature of the case that is why she was very kind to JLN  and profuse in her kindness and love for the latter to turn state witness

The hearing yesterday was spectacular  " She is lying your honor"  So it is just one testimony against another.  We need physical evidence.  That would be more fun.  More fun, fund, indeed in the Philippines.

Sen Santiago steals show at Napoles hearing




Friday, September 13, 2013

What does the testimony of whistle blower for Napoles PDAF scandal prove? Who is senator sexy?

Social and political criticisms

I watched the hearing where the whistle blower told "all" about the PDAF JLN scandal.  I doubt whether his testimony would be enough to convict Janet Napoles or solons for good.

The testimony could be nothing more than hearsay, or a fish tale.

The admission that they faked the signature of the senators and that they got their share in cash would not be enough to convict the recipients.  Only the whistle blower, and if faked the signature of the senator could be held liable.  If there was no written order from  JLN

Who cares who Mr. Sexy Senator is? If you can not tie him down with the receipt of the money, what are we talking about here?