Pages

Wednesday, November 10, 2021

Is it unconstitutional for donors or givers or aid to require testing prior to disbursements?

It is more fun criticizing





Golden Rule

We have been used to bring out the constitution to disobey health protocols;   individual rights vs the protection of the public at large 

So in US this was carried to extreme where such orders as face mask, testing etc were violated and disobeyed because they violated  human rights.   Common sense dictates that the public good prevails over individual rights,   In this case we are in abnormal times and in a pandemic, and yet civil libertarians, constitutionalists lawyers continue to mouth this.

So it is now bad for govt to require recipients of 4ps to be vaccinated.  It is for their own good;  it does not give any gain for the govt to do this;   public health does,  Public good gains more traction.

It is hoped that everybody understands and cooperates and not use this issue to win sympathy from the poor and the masses.   (However the  4ps law does not provide for restrictions and must be followed according to DSWD. However Section 11 of the law RA 11310 provides for health measures for children 

There is such thing as Golden Rule.   -  he who has the gold is obeyed.