If the investigations being conducted were to be endorsed to coutrts, can the parties be hailed to jail. One of the lawyers said that so far, the facts being mentioned are ciurcumstantial and nothing has been shown or proven the guilt beyond reasonable doubt of his client.
We can not blame the parties from denying, or say lying, under oath, because they can indict hemselves come court time.
So far we have affidavits and sometimes hearsays in th hearing, or maritess stuff. That there were meetings, and purported verbal orders or calls can not methinks send the alleged guilty parties to prison sentences. I am sure the police offcers were smart enough not leave any smoking guns.
Or can the trail of narratives when taken up at courts can lead to conviction or lay blame on past Presidents.
The venue was public opinion and the way the hearings were conducted were to sway public opinion. Again we cant prove here any truth so with the investigations. We are left asking the question : "What is the truth>
