May be that is the best way for the detractors of VP Sarah to get her proseuted via impeachment. Since she is an impeachable official, she enjoys immunity from other types of cases. There are several grounds that makes it possible to file impeachment proceedings against her. But there is still the Senate to try her if the HOR files a resolution to have her impeached.
The possible grounds are:
Impeachment can only proceed based on any of the following serious offenses:
- Culpable Violation of the Constitution – A deliberate and willful breach of the Constitution.
- Treason – Betrayal of the country, typically by aiding its enemies during wartime.
- Bribery – Offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting anything of value to influence the actions of an official.
- Graft and Corruption – Illegal or unethical actions that enrich oneself or others to the detriment of public interest.
- Other High Crimes – Serious offenses which demonstrate an abuse of power or breach of the public trust.
- Betrayal of Public Trust – Acts that are considered reprehensible by the standard of public accountability, often involving ethical misconduct or gross negligence.
No 3 and No 6 may apply to her.
However since impeachment is political, this must be weighed heavily by the movers since Sarah got 32 million votes and the voses of Congress and or Senate may not be representative of the 32 million. A people power or military action may block the impeachment
We are seeing that in USA, the special prosecutor Jack Smith, has withdrawan cases vs Tump now that he is elected President And so with the NY judge who has pending decision vs him (Trump is not a convicted felon) The majority rules. The will of the people has to be herard. And that must be considered who wish to prosecute VP Sarah fdurther
