Pages

Showing posts with label political dynasties. Show all posts
Showing posts with label political dynasties. Show all posts

Monday, May 20, 2013

Political dynasties rule

Social and political criticisms

Repost from Al Jazeera by Ted Regencia | May 13, 2013

Political dynasties control 73 of the 80 provinces in the PHL, and 80% of the 220 seats in Congress.

The winners in Senate shows that families control the legislature.  And while this is clearly prohibited in the constitution, this practice continues.   There are comments that the dynasties perpetuate oligarchy and impede progress.

So what does this make out of the PHL?

Friday, May 17, 2013

Will political dynasties end a natural death?

Social and political criticisms

PHL   |  May 17, 2013

The results of the recent elections have been mixed.  For example, in the senatorial slate, the Ejercito, Cayetano, Angara, Binay,  who are members of elite families who are in politics;   however, a scion of a senior senator did not make it to the top 12.

In other areas of the PHL:   the Jalosjos lost out to the  Uys;   in other areas, the Ilgans, the Gacula mayors were not reelected;   the Ynares were succesful in retaining their posts.

It was said though, the dynasties are:

l.  those who handle all the posts in one  area;

2.   that there are 3 more members of the family who are into elective position

Maybe the state should have a clear definition on dynasties and come out with an enabling law to enforce the constutional mandate (Do we need a law still to define what is constutional?  Why were they able to dismiss Corona by citing mere provision of the constitution?  How convenient for our leaders to define/interpret the law according to what is advantageous for them

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Stop suckering the voters please dear Mr Politico

Social and political criticisms

PHL March 2013

While the election watchdogs have issued warning regarding premature campaigning (premature ejaculations) and using public infrastructures to advertise their candidacy, these are largely ignored and disregarded.

Thus:  road repair, hospital construction are publicized and thank you billboards are made, as premature campaigning thanking Mr. Politico for having  this and that construction repair;  as if they spent their own money on the project.

STOP THIS SUCKERING SIRS!

The taxpayers money were spent on this project.  Stop naming gyms, hospitals, school
buildings with your family names.

Thus family dynasties in politics are deemed to be unconstitutional and wrong.

Stop suckering us sirs.  You know and we know that you are not just fooling us but fooling yourselves as well.

When will this travesty end?

Thursday, February 14, 2013

It is hard to dislodge politicians in power - they all have the aces!

Social and political criticisms

PHILIPPINES  | FEBRUARY 14, 2013

I live near a hospital and as leave for work I see daily massive crowd of masses lining up for free cataract services in a government hospital.  The "free" is sponsored by a civic organization (international).  The people wait under tents that bear prominent name and picture of current top official in the province and the new candidate, the mother is often seen at the site.

The prospective candidate has no opponent (who will dare).  The entire province is under the dynasty.  First the father, then the wife, then the son.  Then the mother.  Who can stop them.

And as an overkill, they do this free clinic so that the people will remember their names.  What for? The family name is emblazoned at:   school buildings, waiting sheds, gyms (as if they spent for this), on announcement of infrastructure projects (will Comelec be strict in dismantling names of schoolbuildings waiting sheds etc)

Thursday, October 4, 2012

Nothing wrong with political dynasties? Look at Art II Sec 26 of 1987 Constitution

Social and political criticisms

From yahoo news

Is nothing wrong with political dysnasties?

I thought it was  the intention of the l987 constitution to end the perpetuation of power in one person or one family.  I could be wrong.   Hence the limited term of office, and only 3 consecutive reelection.

However, political dynasties are the norm rather than the exception.

What do you think?  Is nothing wrong with political dynasties?  Is the PHIL govt a democratic institution or monarchial...

Is it all in the family?

Look at Sec 26, Article II of the Constitution which prohibits political dynasties ???!
(What is the alibi again, no enabling law?  How many years since l987 have passed? No one would be a leader enough to pass an enabling law?  Or is it enough that every one what the Sec says?)

Is Pacquiao building his own political dynasty

Friday, August 31, 2012

Electoral Reforms for 2013

Social and political criticisms

This will not get passed?!


Subject: Congressional Reform Act of 2013
 

An idea whose time has come.


In three days, most people in the Philippines 
will have the message. This is one idea that really should be passed around.
*Congressional Reform Act of 2013*_
1. No Pork Barrel. 

2. Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. Our legislators
should serve their terms, then go home and back to work.
3. Term limit should be 6 years, just like the President with NO re-election.
4. NO Dynasty. No Wife, Children, Brothers/Sisters and Family members can hold public office. 
If each person contacts a minimum of twenty people, then it will only take three days for most people to receive the message. Don't you think it's time?

THIS IS HOW YOU FIX THE PHILIPPINES 
If you agree with the above, pass it on.
Please keep it going.

For other elective officials:

l.  No rigodon for wives, children, husband, grandchildren

2.  No streets, gymns, schoolbuildings, ambulances to be named after the incumbent;

3.  No campaigning (strictly) before elections.  Remove all faces of public officials from construction notices, ambulances, govt vehicles.  Such people shall suffer permanent disqualification from public offices