Hindi nila makulong si Putin at Netanyahu. Effective ba jurisdiction nila sa bansang hindi miyembro
Showing posts with label Trillanes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trillanes. Show all posts
Monday, November 4, 2024
Philippines hindi miyembro ng ICC; ano silbi ng ICC hearing warrant of arrest?
It is more fun criticizing
Tuesday, September 25, 2018
Makati RTC Branch 150 issues arrest warrant and HDO vs Sen Trillanes - is democracy dead?
It is more fun criticizing
Rizal Philippines
September 24, 2018
Makati RTC Branch 150 under Judge Alameda issued arrest warrant and HDO vs. Sen Sonny Trillanes mere 24 hours after presentation of evidences. The warrant was promptly served the sheriff and PNP accompanied by no less than NCRPO head Superintedent Eleazar. Sen Trillanes promptly posted a bail a of P200,000 and the arrest warrant earlier issued was cancelled, giving temporary liberty to the good senator. Sen Trillanes said democracy dead and the person behind this move a demon
Rebellion is now non bailable offense but since the original case is alive, Judge Alameda who earlier handled the rebellion and sedition case set the bail at P200,000 which is followed now.
Recitation of facts:
1. Pres Duterte under the Proclamation 572 cancelled the amnesty granted to Trillanes by then Pres. Benigno Aquino (Proclamation 75 series of 2010) on the grounds that the good senator: 1. Did not comply with the documentary requirements of the amnesty (no application form was filed 2. That Trillanes did not admit the crime of rebellion (contained in the application)
2 Sen Trillanes fearing arrest by PNP and /or military holed up in the Senate
3. Sen Trillanes camp asked TRO from Supreme Court against issuance of arrest warrant and HDO
4. The Supreme Court denied the petition of Trillanes and the case was brought back to RTC Branch 150
which the former claimed to have been jurisdiction over the case and the facts of the case.
Arguments of DU30 govt: (Pro)
1. Trillanes did not file, and/or DND could not find the application of Trillanes; (contained in the 7th
or 8th Whereas of proclamation 572) Ang mabigat, and even mentioned in a recent speech, the good
senator said hindi sila dapat nacharge ng rebellion kasi hindi naman talaga ganuon. (Mabigat ito and his
attacks on the Pres, can be construed as continuing rebellion since he never admitted his guilt, and thus
the case should really be alive)
2. That Gen Volt Gazmin usurped the authority of the President when he signed the Certificate of Amnesty
It is not clear under the Proclamation 75 that Gen Gazmin indeed was delegated to grant the amnesty;
processing was delegated to the DND. If we are fundamentalist constitutionalist, indeed only Pres
should sign the final certificate of amnesty.
3. That Trillanes did not admit the crime he committed (a separate affidavit or as contained in the application
On various occasions and lately the good senator stated that his group did not commit rebellion?
Argumentss by Trillanes and supporters (Con)
1. There were affidavits made by various persons to whom Trillanes submitted the application. But the court wants the primary evidence ie the application made by Trillanes; Trillanes said there are videos
As per former Sen. Santiago, only desarollo (documents) evidence count.
2. There were videos shown that showed he filed the applications
3. There were several hundreds and even thousands (followers of Magdalo) who were given amnesty. Is their amnesty defective and can be recalled?
4. That there no usurpation of authority since Pres. Aquinos proclamation clearly gave authority to Gen Gasmin and members of the Amnesty Commission to process the amnesty.
4. That this is unconstitutional. An amnesty granted by the President and approved by the Congress cant be nullified.
5. That he complied with the requirements of Proclamation 75 (but the procedures there are not that clear)
Discussions
1. Sec. Guevarra maintains that the amnesty proclamation granted by then Pres Aquino is not being questioned. in general. What is being questioned in particular is the grant of amnesty (selective) to Sen Trillanes who was reported not to have submitted the necessary application and admission of guilt
2. That this is unconstitutional. That is going to take a lot debate and speculation
1. The Constitution merely states that the President has the authority with the concurrence of Congress
to grant amnesty. That the President has or no power to revoke it is not stated. That means he
can also revoke it Sec 19 Article VII (one liner)
2. The concurrence here is a difficulty. Du30 claims that the constitution grants exclusive right to the President to grant amnesty and there fore the concurrence is a sort of confirmation only (not an approval)
It is not clear under the Proclamation 75 that Gen Gazmin indeed was delegated to grant the amnesty;
processing was delegated to the DND. as is being mouthed by the good senator. Strictly speaking Pres Aquinos name should appear on the grant of amnesty Does it? (Am I talking out of the hat)
Does this exclusive right also mean that the President can also delegate this authority
A lot of generalization, smart aleck remarks, fallacious arguments even from top guys are going around and this makes it more confusing. Tama yong sabi ng iba let the best minds like the courts decide and respect that
Questions begging for answer:
1. Are there factual basis that Trillanes submitted the requirements for the amnesty. Why can he
not produce the primary evidence? Why would you lose the documents which are the basis of his
freedom/amnesty for the rebellion that he actually committed
2. Is the proclamation 572 really unconstitutional? Let us not be quick to judge on that?
3. Is it true that democratic practices are dead? Do we have puppet judges and DOJ staff?
Are they not thinking?
Let us be impartial and stop being swayed by demagogues who may also be servants of the devil. Cant do nothing except to confuse and show hatred amongst us. I have seen this type of people in my own organization: intelligent, but who have crooked understanding of reality. Small minds
Tama sabi ng mga Pastor. God nor the country never create problems. So the good senator can not point to Duterte as the windmill. As Don Quixote, he created the windmill - he is responsible for his fate ever since he staged the Oakwood and Manila Pen attack. Mag isip din tayong mga sympathizers ng senador...Baka kasama tayo duon sa sabi na every minute, a sucker is born
Rizal Philippines
September 24, 2018
Makati RTC Branch 150 under Judge Alameda issued arrest warrant and HDO vs. Sen Sonny Trillanes mere 24 hours after presentation of evidences. The warrant was promptly served the sheriff and PNP accompanied by no less than NCRPO head Superintedent Eleazar. Sen Trillanes promptly posted a bail a of P200,000 and the arrest warrant earlier issued was cancelled, giving temporary liberty to the good senator. Sen Trillanes said democracy dead and the person behind this move a demon
Rebellion is now non bailable offense but since the original case is alive, Judge Alameda who earlier handled the rebellion and sedition case set the bail at P200,000 which is followed now.
Recitation of facts:
1. Pres Duterte under the Proclamation 572 cancelled the amnesty granted to Trillanes by then Pres. Benigno Aquino (Proclamation 75 series of 2010) on the grounds that the good senator: 1. Did not comply with the documentary requirements of the amnesty (no application form was filed 2. That Trillanes did not admit the crime of rebellion (contained in the application)
2 Sen Trillanes fearing arrest by PNP and /or military holed up in the Senate
3. Sen Trillanes camp asked TRO from Supreme Court against issuance of arrest warrant and HDO
4. The Supreme Court denied the petition of Trillanes and the case was brought back to RTC Branch 150
which the former claimed to have been jurisdiction over the case and the facts of the case.
Arguments of DU30 govt: (Pro)
1. Trillanes did not file, and/or DND could not find the application of Trillanes; (contained in the 7th
or 8th Whereas of proclamation 572) Ang mabigat, and even mentioned in a recent speech, the good
senator said hindi sila dapat nacharge ng rebellion kasi hindi naman talaga ganuon. (Mabigat ito and his
attacks on the Pres, can be construed as continuing rebellion since he never admitted his guilt, and thus
the case should really be alive)
2. That Gen Volt Gazmin usurped the authority of the President when he signed the Certificate of Amnesty
It is not clear under the Proclamation 75 that Gen Gazmin indeed was delegated to grant the amnesty;
processing was delegated to the DND. If we are fundamentalist constitutionalist, indeed only Pres
should sign the final certificate of amnesty.
On various occasions and lately the good senator stated that his group did not commit rebellion?
Argumentss by Trillanes and supporters (Con)
1. There were affidavits made by various persons to whom Trillanes submitted the application. But the court wants the primary evidence ie the application made by Trillanes; Trillanes said there are videos
As per former Sen. Santiago, only desarollo (documents) evidence count.
2. There were videos shown that showed he filed the applications
3. There were several hundreds and even thousands (followers of Magdalo) who were given amnesty. Is their amnesty defective and can be recalled?
4. That there no usurpation of authority since Pres. Aquinos proclamation clearly gave authority to Gen Gasmin and members of the Amnesty Commission to process the amnesty.
4. That this is unconstitutional. An amnesty granted by the President and approved by the Congress cant be nullified.
5. That he complied with the requirements of Proclamation 75 (but the procedures there are not that clear)
Discussions
1. Sec. Guevarra maintains that the amnesty proclamation granted by then Pres Aquino is not being questioned. in general. What is being questioned in particular is the grant of amnesty (selective) to Sen Trillanes who was reported not to have submitted the necessary application and admission of guilt
2. That this is unconstitutional. That is going to take a lot debate and speculation
1. The Constitution merely states that the President has the authority with the concurrence of Congress
to grant amnesty. That the President has or no power to revoke it is not stated. That means he
can also revoke it Sec 19 Article VII (one liner)
2. The concurrence here is a difficulty. Du30 claims that the constitution grants exclusive right to the President to grant amnesty and there fore the concurrence is a sort of confirmation only (not an approval)
It is not clear under the Proclamation 75 that Gen Gazmin indeed was delegated to grant the amnesty;
processing was delegated to the DND. as is being mouthed by the good senator. Strictly speaking Pres Aquinos name should appear on the grant of amnesty Does it? (Am I talking out of the hat)
Does this exclusive right also mean that the President can also delegate this authority
A lot of generalization, smart aleck remarks, fallacious arguments even from top guys are going around and this makes it more confusing. Tama yong sabi ng iba let the best minds like the courts decide and respect that
Questions begging for answer:
1. Are there factual basis that Trillanes submitted the requirements for the amnesty. Why can he
not produce the primary evidence? Why would you lose the documents which are the basis of his
freedom/amnesty for the rebellion that he actually committed
2. Is the proclamation 572 really unconstitutional? Let us not be quick to judge on that?
3. Is it true that democratic practices are dead? Do we have puppet judges and DOJ staff?
Are they not thinking?
Let us be impartial and stop being swayed by demagogues who may also be servants of the devil. Cant do nothing except to confuse and show hatred amongst us. I have seen this type of people in my own organization: intelligent, but who have crooked understanding of reality. Small minds
Tama sabi ng mga Pastor. God nor the country never create problems. So the good senator can not point to Duterte as the windmill. As Don Quixote, he created the windmill - he is responsible for his fate ever since he staged the Oakwood and Manila Pen attack. Mag isip din tayong mga sympathizers ng senador...Baka kasama tayo duon sa sabi na every minute, a sucker is born
Friday, October 27, 2017
No wonder the Left (and Trillanes) are criticizing and opposing the country's top leader
It is more fun criticizing
Rizal Philippines
October 27, 2017
Unfulfilled Administration promises from Manila Times
From Inq- Unfulfilled Election promises
It seems that the enthusiasm behind the country's top leadership has waned despite high ratings in the country's survey. No wonder the honeymoon of the administration with the Left is over, and there is no love lost between the leadership and Sen. Sonny Trillanes. Many are thankful that Trillanes is there because otherwise, the top leader is unstoppable in his ways.
Direction going haywire
The direction of the administration has seem to have gone haywire with many of the promises unfulfilled: the horrendous traffic, crimes (still abound - pinasok ng baklas rehas ang bahay namin a mere 80 meters away from the Police Station) marami pang snatchers at non drug related killings
Integrity issues hanging
And there seem to be credibility and integrity issues hanging in the air with regards to Trillanes rift, and the members of the first family wealth, connection with the big time drug lords, the BOC connection
Errors in decision making/knowledge
The top honcho must have made some shooting from the hip, lack of consultation/nor knowledge of the system when he made the promises. Some how he got the votes when the carrots were dangled:
1. Increasing doubling the salaries of soldiers
2. SSS pension increase. This would break the SSS. Now to make the SSS viable, the contributions have to be increased and there are objections from the employers and employees
These are possible if the tax reforms are in place. And so with scholarship at SUC. There are no funds yet. Decide and think and solve the possible problems later?
The administration seem to facing a lot of challenges in having the tax reform bill passed.
One might surmise that the way govt is spending money, the finances are in big deficit now.
Some advance the criticsm that the way the country is being run, is as if it is Davao City
Trapo din
The current leadership is not much different from other adminstrators who give favors to parties who supported the elections campaign and funding, the kababayan and friends family members given preferences. And who can say for sure that corruption has stopped: at BOC, at DPWH, at BIR
And making the govt a center of Mindanao folks and even making Davao City the center of the country
Many were suckered in with pictures and promise of brighter tomorrow which will never come
Pikon and revengeful
Some parties, the big media companies which draw the ire of the top honchos are allegedly soundly rebuked and subjected to harassment. As in the case of Mile Long property of the Prieto. Prieto owns the Inq which is critical of the leadership
Hair raising scenarios
About a revolutionary government about nationwide martial law?
The right leader, the right change for our country will not come yet as of now.
As of now, we can only pray that the current leadership can be more and do more, and rise about pettiness and traditional politics so that he will carve out a name for himself in the Philippine history
Rizal Philippines
October 27, 2017
Unfulfilled Administration promises from Manila Times
From Inq- Unfulfilled Election promises
It seems that the enthusiasm behind the country's top leadership has waned despite high ratings in the country's survey. No wonder the honeymoon of the administration with the Left is over, and there is no love lost between the leadership and Sen. Sonny Trillanes. Many are thankful that Trillanes is there because otherwise, the top leader is unstoppable in his ways.
Direction going haywire
The direction of the administration has seem to have gone haywire with many of the promises unfulfilled: the horrendous traffic, crimes (still abound - pinasok ng baklas rehas ang bahay namin a mere 80 meters away from the Police Station) marami pang snatchers at non drug related killings
Integrity issues hanging
And there seem to be credibility and integrity issues hanging in the air with regards to Trillanes rift, and the members of the first family wealth, connection with the big time drug lords, the BOC connection
Errors in decision making/knowledge
The top honcho must have made some shooting from the hip, lack of consultation/nor knowledge of the system when he made the promises. Some how he got the votes when the carrots were dangled:
1. Increasing doubling the salaries of soldiers
2. SSS pension increase. This would break the SSS. Now to make the SSS viable, the contributions have to be increased and there are objections from the employers and employees
These are possible if the tax reforms are in place. And so with scholarship at SUC. There are no funds yet. Decide and think and solve the possible problems later?
The administration seem to facing a lot of challenges in having the tax reform bill passed.
One might surmise that the way govt is spending money, the finances are in big deficit now.
Some advance the criticsm that the way the country is being run, is as if it is Davao City
Trapo din
The current leadership is not much different from other adminstrators who give favors to parties who supported the elections campaign and funding, the kababayan and friends family members given preferences. And who can say for sure that corruption has stopped: at BOC, at DPWH, at BIR
And making the govt a center of Mindanao folks and even making Davao City the center of the country
Many were suckered in with pictures and promise of brighter tomorrow which will never come
Pikon and revengeful
Some parties, the big media companies which draw the ire of the top honchos are allegedly soundly rebuked and subjected to harassment. As in the case of Mile Long property of the Prieto. Prieto owns the Inq which is critical of the leadership
Hair raising scenarios
About a revolutionary government about nationwide martial law?
The right leader, the right change for our country will not come yet as of now.
As of now, we can only pray that the current leadership can be more and do more, and rise about pettiness and traditional politics so that he will carve out a name for himself in the Philippine history
Sunday, November 27, 2016
Ombudsman blasts historical revisionism and investigates Pres. Du30
It is more fun criticizing
Rizal Philippines
November 27, 2016
From ABS CBN news
Ombudsman Conchita Morales Carpio, in a speech before the homecoming of UP College of law said that she is appalled by the indifference of people to historical revisionism and leaders who let this happen.
This may be the personal opinion of the good ombudsman but she and her office are insuperable. It now has exposed her political views and her partiality which may cloud her judgment and her position entrusted to an office that should be be viewed and observing fairness, impartiality and objectivity
Officers of the judiciary are selected on their wisdom and on the above.
What is the role of the ombudsman? From Ombudsman\ web. Has the ombudsman crossed the limits of her job responsibility and authority
Can her office investigate the OP prior to impeachment? Ombudsman to continueinvestigating Sen Trillanes compalint vs Pree Duterte for plunder Can her office be investigated by other bodies unless she is impeached.
May 2 tayong panggulo sa pamahalaan and sooner of later they will not know what hit them. T and D
Rizal Philippines
November 27, 2016
From ABS CBN news
Ombudsman Conchita Morales Carpio, in a speech before the homecoming of UP College of law said that she is appalled by the indifference of people to historical revisionism and leaders who let this happen.
This may be the personal opinion of the good ombudsman but she and her office are insuperable. It now has exposed her political views and her partiality which may cloud her judgment and her position entrusted to an office that should be be viewed and observing fairness, impartiality and objectivity
Officers of the judiciary are selected on their wisdom and on the above.
What is the role of the ombudsman? From Ombudsman\ web. Has the ombudsman crossed the limits of her job responsibility and authority
Can her office investigate the OP prior to impeachment? Ombudsman to continueinvestigating Sen Trillanes compalint vs Pree Duterte for plunder Can her office be investigated by other bodies unless she is impeached.
May 2 tayong panggulo sa pamahalaan and sooner of later they will not know what hit them. T and D
Monday, September 19, 2016
More intrigues surrounding the testimony of Matobato
It is more fun criticizing
Rizal Philippines
September 19, 2019
Gen Bato, Atty Bato (lawyer of Mayor Espinosa) Edgar MatoBato. War vs. Bato. (droga)
More intrigues:
Matobato a paid witness? Part of LP Plan B
The plot thickens.
Sen Trillanes nagdala kay Matobato sa Senate?
Matobato dating guwardiya ni D5?
Rizal Philippines
September 19, 2019
Gen Bato, Atty Bato (lawyer of Mayor Espinosa) Edgar MatoBato. War vs. Bato. (droga)
More intrigues:
Matobato a paid witness? Part of LP Plan B
The plot thickens.
Sen Trillanes nagdala kay Matobato sa Senate?
Matobato dating guwardiya ni D5?
Saturday, April 30, 2016
May P211 milyones nga ba si Presidentiable Duterte BPI Dona Julia Vargas branch kaya siya ay mpeachable?
It is more fun criticizing
It has been alleged by VP Candidate Trillanes that Davao City Mayor Rodrigo Duterte has P211 millions deposited at BPI Dona Julia Vargas branch. This was not declared in the SALN of Rodrigo Duterte and therefore could be impeached. This came as a shock and could alter the outcome of the election for having brought out Duterte as a fraud, dishonest, lying shenigan despite his rising rating and popularity. Yesterday Sec. Mar Roxas in a video branded Duterte as a liar (because Duterte denied the existence of the said account - but a citizen deposited P500 in the said account and the name of Duterte came out)
In the Philstar April 30, 2016 12:00 am article it was said that Duterte has only P27,000 in the said account as tweeted by TV 5 reporter Junytee Loyola.. The document was shown at Daet Camarines Norte rally.
On Monday, Duterte lawyer Salvador Panelo will be in BPI branch to open his account. to show how much deposit he has. He asked Trillanes to be there. The lawyer will open the account only if Trillanes shows the affidavit to show his allegation of the P211 million.
Duterte said that he will shut down Congress (not a nice thing to do) if he gets elected and there will be a threat of impeachment to prevent him from accomplishing his mission. I hope this issue will not drag the good name of BPI into this mudslinging as well as the alleged informants of Sen Trillanes.
From Update - Atty Paola Alvarez spokesperson of PDP Laban calls Trilanes inventor of the week
It has been alleged by VP Candidate Trillanes that Davao City Mayor Rodrigo Duterte has P211 millions deposited at BPI Dona Julia Vargas branch. This was not declared in the SALN of Rodrigo Duterte and therefore could be impeached. This came as a shock and could alter the outcome of the election for having brought out Duterte as a fraud, dishonest, lying shenigan despite his rising rating and popularity. Yesterday Sec. Mar Roxas in a video branded Duterte as a liar (because Duterte denied the existence of the said account - but a citizen deposited P500 in the said account and the name of Duterte came out)
In the Philstar April 30, 2016 12:00 am article it was said that Duterte has only P27,000 in the said account as tweeted by TV 5 reporter Junytee Loyola.. The document was shown at Daet Camarines Norte rally.
On Monday, Duterte lawyer Salvador Panelo will be in BPI branch to open his account. to show how much deposit he has. He asked Trillanes to be there. The lawyer will open the account only if Trillanes shows the affidavit to show his allegation of the P211 million.
Duterte said that he will shut down Congress (not a nice thing to do) if he gets elected and there will be a threat of impeachment to prevent him from accomplishing his mission. I hope this issue will not drag the good name of BPI into this mudslinging as well as the alleged informants of Sen Trillanes.
From Update - Atty Paola Alvarez spokesperson of PDP Laban calls Trilanes inventor of the week
Wednesday, August 27, 2014
Charges of corruption in financial district is endemic among all LGUs nationawide?
It is more fun criticizing
Rizal Philippines | August 27, 2014
Repost from Rappler (could Rappler get into trouble?)
Rambo to another Rambo
Is it not really a demolition job by Sen Trillanes? Or is it war.? On top of the alleged P2 billion over pricing of govt building construction, Sen Trillanes urges businessmen to speak up regarding the long standing rumors that the City Hall officials grant permits in exchange for condo units (I have heard even a floor for multi stores for condo units) Of course this is not unique to Makati - go anywhere QC, Mandaluyong, Pasig etc. it is the same. It is not tuwid na daan for everyone.
This is an eye opener regarding:
1. difficulty of doing business in the Phil as what the World Bank reports;
Rizal Philippines | August 27, 2014
Repost from Rappler (could Rappler get into trouble?)
Rambo to another Rambo
Is it not really a demolition job by Sen Trillanes? Or is it war.? On top of the alleged P2 billion over pricing of govt building construction, Sen Trillanes urges businessmen to speak up regarding the long standing rumors that the City Hall officials grant permits in exchange for condo units (I have heard even a floor for multi stores for condo units) Of course this is not unique to Makati - go anywhere QC, Mandaluyong, Pasig etc. it is the same. It is not tuwid na daan for everyone.
This is an eye opener regarding:
1. difficulty of doing business in the Phil as what the World Bank reports;
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)