Strict interpretation of what is written or being lax (BENDALOS) by amicus curiae

It is more fun criticizing

Such is the first principle being debated in the Sarah impeachment:    debate on the denominator, for the all the senators:   24 or those just in attendance.     One magistrate, Azcuna, says its 24 since he was the orginal author, I agree.   The other three are of an announcer or common man mentality:   it depends, or maybe it does not matter. -  WHAT IS POPULAR OR WHAT IS .... (whom you had dinner with ....) matters.

Strictly to the letter,or to the spirit?

The religious are split between the fundamentalists and those who live according to the spirit of the scriptures or what is written.  Thus among Franciscans there is a schism.   Among the Muslimes, there are fundamentalists -  strict interpretation of the law and the liberals.

In my college education, I was taught and I kept in mind that there are certain subjects that are fundamental and immutable:   math and science for intance.   1+1 =2 cant be changed.  

In literature, when somebody says his interpretation of the poems is in between the lines, the Prof says curtly "Where is it?  I coud not see any"  And the prof became a National Artist.

In drama, a meztizo professor surnamed Romualdez (he reports in MB SLC) says answers to his exams are the very same he mentions in pop sheet, attempted to reduce drama critique into something that is constant.

So whom do we agree, or spend money with (P60 m  a day expense on impeachment?)     Azcuna or the 3 others/   I go for Azcuna...

What if the Senators decide to amend the constitution and use another denominator?   One legal mind said it could be unconstitutional.  Do you agree.   ?

Another important issue:   the question by Sen. Robinhood Padilla -  since impeachment court is a superior court, can any other courts touch or investigate its members while in session (or arrest its subject as with RTC)?   Can other courts pressure its members (as what is happening)   This is worth seriously looked into  

Death of fmr Usec Catalina Cabral - what are its consequences? Chilling effect on others who know plenty about the scandal!

It is more fun criticizing

She fell off the ravine while in Baguio City with the driver.   She knows so much about flood control anomaly and the insertions.   Or karmaic justice served ito?

1.  Was it a suicide, planned, meant to silence a witness?

2.  What are its consequences?  Will the culprits go free (no more credible witness to pin down the culprits)   Will the flood control projects cases be dismissed and the cases closed?

3.  Karma served in BC?

New version of:      EJK, tanggal witness (vs tanim witness?)

Whats next?

Those who are involved in this mess should avoid going to places where there are cliffs or  trucks buses passing by.   You can fall of the cliff, or run over by trucks of buses

A fair warning to the 18th congress and Senate.  God is watching you.   Or your conscience.    Karmaic and divine justice is everywhere anytime.

All want justice and equality

It is more fun criticizing

The parties who is arrrested and who might be arrested are now crying for fairness, justice and due process.  The victims are likewise saying that these were not available to the victims who died due to the brutal drug war.

But what is paianfully visible here is that the former President's head was served to the ICC on silver platter, and this was planned all along by honorable members of the cabinet.   But many times public pronouncements were made on the contrary.   This can be seen as deceit to former political allies of the highest order.   Favors done in the past meant nothing to those who got the favors and the former were neutralized for power play purposes.  

The masses may sympathize and be angry to the other side and hate and protest the other side.  And what is going to happen to our country?

Loss of belief in the justice system

It is more fun criticizing

A sportsmate returned from his hibernation in Baguio yesterday.  I visited him early this morning

He complained his current status of his pending case.

He was a union leader and claimed he was illegally dismissed and his group filed a case of illegal

dismissal vs the employer.  On the other hand, the employer alleged it is all ready bankrupt and could not pay.  They escaped by establishing a new corporation  but the office and officer were the same

They were given a judgement to sell off properties.  Hence they broke into the warehouse of the alleged employer.  They had SWAT team and sheriff with them.  However a case of theft and malicious mischief was filed against them (nabaligtad na) and which merited imprisonment.

He opted for probation being a senior;  however getting the paperworks was tedious.  His companions who fought back vs the case, had a case dismissal.  His probation of only 5 days is far from finished.

He says that the justice system is not working   Just like in the movies, he says that justice system only works for those who can afford good lawyers.  It is no joke to have a lawyer appear for you!

He can only have a consolation, that the former head of the company he worked in died a painful death, and suffered long.  There is Divine Justice at work.

Amen

The Impachment Proceedings Should be Circumspect

Filosofo Tasio Lives

I hope that the Congress and Senate, being collegial body should now be circumspect in studying the impeachment vs the CJ of SC.  If you read the manifesto of members of the judiciary, you and I must agree that CJ should not be tried for the decisions made were collegial in nature.  CJ, RC can not be singled out.  That is why the followers of CJ are viewing that the current impeachment proceedings are levelled against a co equal branch of the government.

I hope justice and sanity prevail.