Some legal experts observe that procedures in serving of Arrest Warrant vs FPRRD was not observed:
1. The custody of local competent court of the accused;
2 Rights of due process including the right to bail.
Did FPRRD trick the arresting team to make this error and thus nullify the arrest. (He was not given custody of competent local court, including the right to bail)?
The currrent President reversed himself - he initially said ICC cant execute the arrest warrant if it comes, and then later on declared that it is duty of Philippine govt to cooperate with international bodies. We can not understand the flip flopping, and or what is he saying now. For being inconsistent. Well this a convenient way to eliminate enemies. (Not even the hair of Sen de la Rosa) One can always change his mind.
More trouble ahead. What happened to their team, to their legal consultants and have not drawn out scenarios clearly for consequence of action?
