Who was out order? D5 or Arellano?

It is more fun criticizing

Rizal Philippines
September 15, 2016


From GMA news - De Liman declares

Explosive revelation from Matobato on DU30

                                              Eduard Matobato - now lives in Pangasinan (why)

In the Senate hearing today, Sen Peter Alan Cayetano was declared out of order by Chair Senator Leila de Lima.  The time of Sen Cayetano was cut when the questioning of Edgar Matobato strayed into the question of "how come you are  now in Pangasinan coming all the way from Davao.  Of course we know that Urbiztondo is in Pangasinan)  The microphone of Cayetano was cut off(who is rude) and Cayetano had to be escorted, upon instruction of De LIMa out of the session.

 Matobato alleges VM Paolo is drug user, DU30 was alleged to be behind DDS, DU30 ordered the killing  of DI of Pres. sister.  But the ombudsman has issued a ruling all ready on the non existence of DDS. CHR was not able to prove the existence of DDS   Why make Senate a forum (forum shopping) to open the case embarrass the Pres?  Is this not a plot by LP to bring down DU30.   Talk about attacks including attacks from VP who is part of the Pres. Cabinet?

Sen Ping Lacson saw inconsistency too in Matobato's testimony.  He has not seen the latter (although isinabit siya, nor the personnel he mentioned were not known by the good senator formerly from PNP)   Sen Lacson sees inconsistency in Matobato testimony

But who is really unparliamentarian.  ?  The good lady senator continued asking the witness with leading questions which is uncalled for the chair who must be neutral.  That is what Sen Cayetano said to the good senator.

The lady senator was observed to be doing that when he led and literally put words into the mouth of the CHR head re the new definition of EJ (after she erred on the scope of this hearing in the definition of AO35)

The witness was observed to have no one who can corroborate his statement not even his companions nor his live in partner. They appear to hearsay fabricated in the august halls of Senate? And would appear useless as testimony even under a judicial oath.  This is what the questioning of  Sen Gatchalian showed.

The witness implicated the sister of Pres DU30 and son VM Paolo Duterte

Who was really out of order?

Fees for toilet use, parking fees at malls - arent they illegal?

Social and political criticisms

Manila PHL  |  May 26, 2013

I came from the provinces today.  On the way to transportation terminal, I passed by the paid parking multi level buildings and while looking for the bathrooms ;  I noted that some of them have resorted to paid toilets.

Tha sanitation code   PD 856 is clear that establishments must have toilets.  It is correct to say whether they are for a fee or not is not clear.  But if the law says they must provide, then it is presumed that they are for use of public for free, as are ramps, stairs elevators,  alleys.

HLURB also provides for  parking for x number of units.  The late senator was right in pursuing this advocacy.  Perhaps the son and daughter can pursue this