Do you agree with this Putin's speech referring to Muslim minority/migrants? Simple yet powerful solution

It is more fun criticizing

How Russia deals with Muslim immigrants

Read previous article on absence of Muslim problem in Japan

Pres Vladimir Putin was alleged to have said this before Duma (Russian Parliament):

On February 04, 2013, Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, addressed the Duma, (Russian Parliament), and gave a speech about the tensions with minorities in Russia : 

"In Russia live Russians. Any minority, from anywhere, if it wants to live in Russia, to work and eat in Russia, should speak Russian, and should respect the Russian laws. If they prefer Sharia Law, and live the life of Muslims then we advise them to go to those places where that's the state law. Russia does not need Muslim minorities. Minorities need Russia, and we will not grant them special privileges, or try to change our laws to fit their desires, no matter how loud they yell 'discrimination'. We will not tolerate disrespect of our Russian culture. We had better learn from the suicides of America, England, Holland and France, if we are to survive as a nation. The Muslims are taking over those countries and they will not take over Russia. The Russian customs and traditions are not compatible with the lack of culture or the primitive ways of Sharia Law and Muslims. When this honorable legislative body thinks of creating new laws, it should have in mind the Russian national interest first, observing that the Muslim minorities are not Russians. 

The politicians in the Duma gave Putin a five minute standing ovation.

Do you think he is correct in dealing with this problem?
Counter jihad is proposing such a solution:  banning mosques, banning Sharia law.  Japan even bans importation of Quran in Arabic.  We need to be patriotic. In the Phil, I think it is ok for Muslims to have their own country in Mindanao, secede and forever remove Muslims in Luzon and Mindanao.  And implement what Japan has decreed for Muslims. That is the only way we can avoid trouble with Islam Exremists.  They should have visa when they visit Visayas and Luzon.

Counter jihad to neutralize terrorist threat from Muslim extremist

It is more fun criticizing

March 25, 2016

Citizen Warrior

Counter Jihad Coalition

Jihad is an integral part of Islam  There is no religious intolerance in Islam.  Its aim is to conquer the world

More on what Jihad is :

The word jihad occurs in the Koran in 164 separate verses.  Jihad as war is set apart from the tribal warfare common to Mohammed’s lifetime, and sanctified as a special and divinely-blessed activity.  It is both a duty and an opportunity to gain in divine favor, and to enrich one’s self through the seizing of the goods of non-Muslims who do not yet submit to Islam.

Islam’s greatest philosophers endorsed this position.  Avicenna, the Persian philosopher frequently cited by Muslims, Jews, and Christians alike, wrote of jihad in this way.  Jihad was in a class of beneficial acts, he said, that were good not only for the soul but for “worldly benefits,” because you got to plunder the enemy.  (This is in his Metaphysics of the Healing, Book Ten, Chapter Three, if you are following along at home.)  He went on to write that, “as for enemies and those who oppose the law, [the legislator] must decree waging war against them and destroying them — after calling on them to accept the truth — and [decree] that their property and women must be declared free for the spoil.” (That’s in Book Ten, Chapter Five.)

Likewise, in Reliance of the Traveler:  The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law, Ahamd ibn Naqib al-Misri states that “Jihad means to wage war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion.”

This has been a consistent feature of the writings of the finest minds in Islam for a thousand years, in other words.  They are the ones behind Islamic reformer Sultan Shaheen’s remarks that “For hundreds of years now, major Muslim theologians have been engaged in creating a coherent theology of intolerance and violence in order to expand the Islamic reach.”  He clarified, “Luminaries of Islam have established a theology which primarily says that Islam must conquer the world.”

That’s all ISIS is saying.  When are we going to be honest about the depth of the problem?   Pres Obamas remarks on the 14 dead in California that America should avoid stereotype and discrimination is disappointing.  If you read the Islam literature, as is above, you will understand what their mission is :  to conquer the world and yet it is all about rhetoric?   Is Obama a Muslim?

After learning that the radicalization spread among the Mollenbeek Muslim residents from CIB, run by a Muslim spiritual leader, and after learning that ISIS declared war vs Vatican, I was about to propose any or all of the following options:

      1.  Counter jihad, or somebody from the Church start a theology of counter jihad, a polemic to neutralize and even fight Islam. But somebody must start an active polemic and counter measure to stop this growing threat.  The Church has done active role vs oppression as it did in South America where Theology of Liberation originated vs. oppressors and dictators.  Now that ISIS has declared war vs the Church, will it simply wait for things to happen and not even have a working defense (militarily)

                     Can we have a new Holy Crusade ?

.  I did not know that such, albeit from secular sector, all ready started from the Citizen Warrior.