Inquirer. Espinosa recants de Lima testimony at Senate
What is the impact of Espinosa's recanting of testimony vs Senator de Lima?
Nothing because he is not a witness? And who is likely to believe him, and who believed him initially? He is a criminal and probably we could not care less for their testimony.
The recanting has a publicity effect and will probably lift the ranking of the good senator (but not enough to lift her to top 12. If the good senator does not get out of this mess soon, and she will find difficulty because her term expires this June. And if her friends at EU do not work fast enough
